--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 25 from Frama-C-discuss on November 2018 ---
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: I wrote a blog post about my experiences with Frama-C so far



See also (automatic path-test generation with the PathCrawler plugin to
MEASURE worst-case execution time):

http://pathcrawler-online.com:8080/pubs/ast09researchcopy.pdf


On 26/11/2018 12:54, François Bobot wrote:
> Le 26/11/2018 à 12:31, Tomas Härdin a écrit :
>>> By the way, you say in your post:
>>>> Frama-C is not a panacea, since it says nothing about how long a
>>>> program might take to execute.
>>>  In fact, some research work has been done on that topic:
>>>  Certifying and Reasoning on Cost Annotations in C Programs 
>>>  https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-32469-7_3
>> Neat. Can't access the paper, sadly.
> It is accessible here:
>   https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00702665v2/document
>
> A broader overview of the project is available here
> Certified complexity (cerco):
>   http://cerco.cs.unibo.it/export/3340/Papers/fopara2013/fopara13.pdf
>
>
> But the simplifying part is that is is applied to a 8051 processor which doesn't have pipeline and
> cache.
>
> Best,
>