--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 14 from Frama-C-discuss on July 2020 ---
You are correct. The proof goes through with the file attached to the message. But the proof fails if the assertion â\at(dst, Pre) == \at(dst, Here)â at the end is deleted. The question was just why that assertion is needed for the proof to go through. Thanks! -Mark PS: Tomas Härdin asked about giving the solvers more time. Increasing the time to âwp-timeout 600 had no effect. My experience is that either the prover comes back quickly or it doesnât come back, but I could use some guidance on how much time to give the provers. From: Frama-c-discuss <frama-c-discuss-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr> on behalf of Loïc Correnson <loic.correnson at cea.fr> Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Nested loops I donât really understand the problem. Without any assertion, I get instant proof for all loop invariants: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20200727/aa0a7b8a/attachment.html>