--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 57 from Frama-C-discuss on December 2011 ---
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Pascal Cuoq <pascal.cuoq at gmail.com> wrote: > With only a little bit of additional work, the value analysis would also > tell you that beyond the information flow shown above, AES is susceptible > to cache-timing attacks ( > http://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf ). And it would > verify that Skein-256 is not. This kind of verification was put together > with researchers and students at University of Minho, and it's currently > not documented > It's documented now, at http://blog.frama-c.com/index.php?post/2011/12/31/Do-not-use-AES-in-a-context-where-timing-attacks-are-possible Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20111231/fa0a9c03/attachment.htm>