--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 19 from Frama-C-discuss on January 2016 ---
Hi, This is now fixed in Alt-Ergo's master branch: https://github.com/OCamlPro/alt-ergo/issues/11 - Mohamed. -- Senior R&D Engineer, OCamlPro SAS Research Associate, VALS team, LRI Webpage: http://www.iguer.info Le 27/01/2016 15:24, Wolfram Kahl a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:40:33AM +0100, Claude Marché wrote: >> By default, to prove a goal from a set of hypotheses, Alt-Ergo negates >> the goal and attempts to establish unsatisfiability. >> >> With the experimental and undocument options related to "models", the >> goal is not negated anymore, hence the wrong results you get. > Thank you! So it is not due to the experimental nature, but due to the design... > > Given the fact that Frama-C exposes access to Alt-Ergo's options > essentially via a simple double click on the goal, > it might be useful to document from the Frama-C side > which options of Alt-Ergo could be useful for Frama-C users, > and which are unsafe/forbidden. > (Since currently, Frama-C still picks up a green bullet for that falsum...) > > > Wolfram > _______________________________________________ > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pièce jointe HTML a été nettoyée... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20160128/c154730b/attachment.html>