--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 14 from Frama-C-discuss on July 2020 ---
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Nested loops



You are correct.  The proof goes through with the file attached to the message.  But the proof fails if the assertion “\at(dst, Pre) == \at(dst, Here)” at the end is deleted.  The question was just why that assertion is needed for the proof to go through.  Thanks!  -Mark

PS: Tomas Härdin asked about giving the solvers more time.  Increasing the time to –wp-timeout 600 had no effect.  My experience is that either the prover comes back quickly or it doesn’t come back, but I could use some guidance on how much time to give the provers.


From: Frama-c-discuss <frama-c-discuss-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr> on behalf of Loïc Correnson <loic.correnson at cea.fr>
Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Nested loops

I don’t really understand the problem. Without any assertion, I get instant proof for all loop invariants:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20200727/aa0a7b8a/attachment.html>