--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 19 from Frama-C-discuss on April 2014 ---
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Frank Dordowsky <frank at dordowsky.de> wrote: > I have tried clang and it seems to work. I also could reduce the > number of options of the command. This is my command now: > > frama-c -cpp-command 'clang -C -E -I.' -wp -wp-rte -pp-annot constant.c > > You should still use -cpp-extra-args=-nostdinc -cpp-extra-args=-I`frama-c -print-share-path`/libc . Just because it happens to work on the simple example you initially set out to parse does not mean that using the compiler-provided headers is a good idea. In other words: The headers on the left are designed to work with another compiler and if they were ever shown a formal annotation, they weren't looking. The headers on the right contain ACSL specifications for a large number of standard library functions. Which ones do you want to use for your analyses? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20140418/a2fce29d/attachment.html>