--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 14 from Frama-C-discuss on November 2009 ---
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] different range in the loop depending de type



Hello St?phane,

> Depending the type of i, the range is not the same.
> The range of i in the loop is [0..10] (for int) or [0..15] for char or
> short.
_____

void main(void)
{
char i=0;
int j=0;
while (i<10) i++;
while (j<10) j++;
}

[value] ====== VALUES COMPUTED ======
[value] Values for function main:
i IN {10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; }
j IN {10; }
_____

It's interesting that you noticed this behavior,
because I fixed a comparable problem on short
notice this summer for an intern who had to demo
his plug-in the following week.

Note that the AST for the two loops is different:
  i = (char)0;
  j = 0;
  while ((int )i < 10) {i = (char )((int )i + 1);}
  while (j < 10) {j ++;}

CIL transforms the code thus because the C standard
specifies that operators such as ++ do not operate on
types smaller than int, and that values of these types
are implicitly promoted to int in these conditions.

Meanwhile, in the absence of any loop-related
option, the value analysis tries to keep computations
short at the price of precision by using a technique
called "widening". In order to limit the loss of precision,
however, various heuristics are used, including a
syntactic one for the j loop that recognizes that 
j IN [0..10] is a good candidate for the loop invariant.

This heuristic does not currently recognize the condition
((int )i < 10) as one where it would be valuable to try
the same kind of invariant.

I have filed this issue as "feature wish" in the Bug Tracking
System, so that it is not forgotten.
http://bts.frama-c.com/view.php?id=325

Pascal