--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 8 from Frama-C-discuss on March 2020 ---
Hi, Actually, there is a difference when issuing a proof on a single property rather than on all properties of a given function. However, there shall be _no_ difference when working with one or several functions, since each function is treated separately. Could you minimize the problem and share your test cases? Thanks! L. ________________________________________ De : Frama-c-discuss [frama-c-discuss-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr] de la part de Alexander Bakst [abakst at galois.com] Envoyé : mardi 17 mars 2020 23:33 à : Frama-C public discussion Objet : [Frama-c-discuss] Caching/Session Behavior Hi all, I hope this finds everyone in good health. Iâm not sure I understand the caching/session behavior of frama-c/wp. I have a file with many functions `f,g,h` and so on. Iâve produced a proof using TIP/provers that appears to play back successfully from the cache when I run `frama-c -wp ⦠-wp-fct f`. However, one of the postconditions of the proof _fails_ when I use the invocation `frama-c -wp ⦠-wp-fct f,g,h,â¦`. Is this behavior expected, or is there something I can do so that the verification of `f` succeeds with the latter command without rebuilding the proof? Thanks, Alexander _______________________________________________ Frama-c-discuss mailing list Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss