---
layout: fc_discuss_archives
title: Message 47 from Frama-C-discuss on November 2013
---
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] JessieIntegerModel question
- From: regehr at cs.utah.edu (John Regehr)
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:05:40 -0700 (MST)
- In-reply-to: <CAOH62Jg5UyBhM6T3Fke9+gXaruBoQvRd5WB-m7=qGq-W0ue1Jw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <527C0595.5040000@cs.utah.edu> <CAOH62Jg5UyBhM6T3Fke9+gXaruBoQvRd5WB-m7=qGq-W0ue1Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Pascal, I agree that your solution is the correct one, not only from the
point of view of making the solver's work easier, but also because some
unknown fraction of unsigned wraparounds in C code are buggy -- so we
should make no-overflow be the default behavior. Wraparound hides bugs.
John