--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 33 from Frama-C-discuss on April 2009 ---
Claude March? wrote: > I don't understand why you are so pessimistic, Pascal. > The answer is simple: just realize your axiomatization in Cuoq. Sorry: I > meant in Coq. Another, probably quicker, possibility is first to try to prove //@ lemma l : 0=0; from your axiomatization. If it is proven, then yes surely you have to investigate you axiomatization. A way to do it then is to remove parts of it until you discovered the eaxt subset of axioms that can derive false. And if the lemme is not proven, then you might also try to prove //@ assert 0=0; just before return statement of the function that should not be proved so quickly. And then proceed the same to remove some part of axiomatization. Hope this helps, - Claude