--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 27 from Frama-C-discuss on August 2015 ---
ps: I think it would be a great feature addition to have a way to directly force such properties as axioms to some analysis instead of having to code them up using Frama_C_*() primitives (using the entropy source). I imagine this would ease the analysis too, since it wouldn't waste time having to analyze this extra boilerplate whose only purpose was to set a predetermined analysis state. Thoughts? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Tim Newsham <tim.newsham at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to prove that some code is safe for all buffers you can pass > in > as input. Is there a way to construct an arbitrary sized buffer (say char*) > in frama such that all values are arbitrary ([--..--]) and so that the > properties \valid(p + (0..sz-1)) and \initialized(p + (0..sz-1)) hold? > > -- > Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | @newshtwit | > thenewsh.blogspot.com > -- Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham | @newshtwit | thenewsh.blogspot.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20150819/ff8c9098/attachment.html>