--- layout: fc_discuss_archives title: Message 19 from Frama-C-discuss on January 2016 ---
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] What is the point of ``All models'' in Alt-Ergo?



Hi,

This is now fixed in Alt-Ergo's master branch:

https://github.com/OCamlPro/alt-ergo/issues/11

- Mohamed.

-- 
Senior R&D Engineer, OCamlPro SAS
Research Associate, VALS team, LRI
Webpage: http://www.iguer.info


Le 27/01/2016 15:24, Wolfram Kahl a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:40:33AM +0100, Claude Marché wrote:
>> By default, to prove a goal from a set of hypotheses, Alt-Ergo negates
>> the goal and attempts to establish unsatisfiability.
>>
>> With the experimental and undocument options related to "models", the
>> goal is not negated anymore, hence the wrong results you get.
> Thank you! So it is not due to the experimental nature, but due to the design...
>
> Given the fact that Frama-C exposes access to Alt-Ergo's options
> essentially via a simple double click on the goal,
> it might be useful to document from the Frama-C side
> which options of Alt-Ergo could be useful for Frama-C users,
> and which are unsafe/forbidden.
> (Since currently, Frama-C still picks up a green bullet for that falsum...)
>
>
> Wolfram
> _______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss

-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe HTML a été nettoyée...
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20160128/c154730b/attachment.html>