unknown identifier in contract is not rejected
ID0001783: **This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 1783. Further discussion may take place here.** --- | **Id** | **Project** | **Category** | **View** | **Due Date** | **Updated** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ID0001783 | Frama-Clang | Kernel | public | 2014-05-24 | 2015-02-18 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Reporter** | jens | **Assigned To** | virgile | **Resolution** | fixed | | **Priority** | normal | **Severity** | major | **Reproducibility** | always | | **Platform** | - | **OS** | - | **OS Version** | - | | **Product Version** | Frama-C Neon-20140301 | **Target Version** | - | **Fixed in Version** | - | ### Description : I was playing around with operator overloading and found this example, where the contract mentions an unknown identifier "y". Frama-Clang does not complain about it at all. class A { int x; public: /*@ // y is unknown here and should be rejected ensures \result.x == y; */ A& operator=(int x) { this->x = x; return *this; } }; ### Additional Information : This refers to the Frama-Clang version obtained by Virgile on 23. May. ### Steps To Reproduce : in acslplusplus go to the directory C++Examples/OperatorOverloading and call make basic_assignment_error1.wp
issue