ID0002225: **This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 2225. Further discussion may take place here.** --- | **Id** | **Project** | **Category** | **View** | **Due Date** | **Updated** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ID0002225 | Frama-C | Kernel > ACSL implementation | public | 2016-04-13 | 2016-04-13 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Reporter** | DavidCok | **Assigned To** | yakobowski | **Resolution** | fixed | | **Priority** | normal | **Severity** | major | **Reproducibility** | always | | **Platform** | Windows | **OS** | - | **OS Version** | - | | **Product Version** | - | **Target Version** | - | **Fixed in Version** | - | ### Description : The Frama-C kernel appears to accept \valid(a + (0..9)) , but not \valid(a[0..9]). Is this intended? That is must the argument of \valid and similar functions be a set of pointers, but not an equivalent set of l-value locations?