Cute boolean options too cute for their own good
ID0001085:
**This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 1085. Further discussion may take place here.**
---
| **Id** | **Project** | **Category** | **View** | **Due Date** | **Updated** |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ID0001085 | Frama-C | Documentation | public | 2012-02-08 | 2016-06-21 |
| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Reporter** | pascal | **Assigned To** | signoles | **Resolution** | fixed |
| **Priority** | normal | **Severity** | minor | **Reproducibility** | always |
| **Platform** | - | **OS** | - | **OS Version** | - |
| **Product Version** | - | **Target Version** | - | **Fixed in Version** | Frama-C Oxygen-20120901 |
### Description :
$ bin/toplevel.opt -kernel-help
Description: General options provided by the Frama-C kernel
Most options of the form '-option-name' and without any parameter
have an opposite with the name '-no-option-name'.
***** LIST OF AVAILABLE OPTIONS:
*** ANALYSIS OPTIONS
...
-safe-arrays for arrays that are fields inside structs, assume that
accesses are in bounds (set by default)
...
There is no way to know that the option to unset this option is -unsafe-arrays
issue