ID0000913: **This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 913. Further discussion may take place here.** --- | **Id** | **Project** | **Category** | **View** | **Due Date** | **Updated** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ID0000913 | Frama-C | Plug-in > Eva | public | 2011-08-05 | 2011-10-10 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Reporter** | yakobowski | **Assigned To** | yakobowski | **Resolution** | fixed | | **Priority** | normal | **Severity** | minor | **Reproducibility** | always | | **Platform** | - | **OS** | - | **OS Version** | - | | **Product Version** | Frama-C Carbon-20110201 | **Target Version** | - | **Fixed in Version** | Frama-C Nitrogen-20111001 | ### Description : A precise assigns clause for function memcpy is /*@ assigns ((char*)dst)[0..n] \from ((char*)src)[0..n]; assigns \result \from dst; */ void* Frama_C_memcpy(void* dst, const void* src, unsigned n); This is currently not treated by the aforementioned Db function, probably because of the casts to char*. By using char* directly everywhere, the assigns clause is (imprecisely) translated to something equivalent to /*@ assigns dst[..] \from src[..]; Since the comment on the function is to complain if some unsupported cases are required, I'm complaining :-)