ID0001058: **This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 1058. Further discussion may take place here.** --- | **Id** | **Project** | **Category** | **View** | **Due Date** | **Updated** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ID0001058 | Frama-C | Plug-in > jessie | public | 2012-01-04 | 2012-01-04 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Reporter** | virgile | **Assigned To** | cmarche | **Resolution** | open | | **Priority** | normal | **Severity** | minor | **Reproducibility** | have not tried | | **Platform** | - | **OS** | - | **OS Version** | - | | **Product Version** | Frama-C GIT, precise the release id | **Target Version** | - | **Fixed in Version** | - | ### Description : When using \at(x,L) in annotation where L is a C label, Jessie does not put the label at its correct place, resulting in unprovable formulæ. ### Steps To Reproduce : Starting from the following file: int f(void) { int x = 0; L: x++; //@ assert \at(x,L) == x - 1; } frama-c -jessie -jessie-why-opt="-tc" bug.i file.i produces a correct file.jessie/file.jc but an incorrect file.jessie/why/file.why (label L gets placed at the beginning of the function).