ID0002427: **This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 2427. Further discussion may take place here.** --- | **Id** | **Project** | **Category** | **View** | **Due Date** | **Updated** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ID0002427 | Frama-C | Plug-in > wp | public | 2019-02-16 | 2019-10-17 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Reporter** | jens | **Assigned To** | correnson | **Resolution** | open | | **Priority** | normal | **Severity** | minor | **Reproducibility** | always | | **Platform** | - | **OS** | - | **OS Version** | - | | **Product Version** | Frama-C 18-Argon | **Target Version** | - | **Fixed in Version** | - | ### Description : When the attached program foo.c is analysed with the command line frama-c -pp-annot -no-unicode -wp -wp-prover alt-ergo -wp-prover eprover foo.c then the assertion "\false" is verified with "eprover" (2.2). To me the axiomatics and the lemma look fine which would mean that it is a problem of "eprover". However, I would like that an WP expert has a look at it before I contact the developer of "eprover". Thanks in advance. ### Steps To Reproduce : I am using Frama-C 18.0, Why3 0.88.3, alt-ergo 2.2.0, eprover 2.2. ## Attachments - [foo.c](/uploads/96dbe2588b177df6328014404f4b189f/foo.c)