ID0001369: **This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 1369. Further discussion may take place here.** --- | **Id** | **Project** | **Category** | **View** | **Due Date** | **Updated** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ID0001369 | Frama-C | Plug-in > Eva | public | 2013-02-15 | 2014-03-13 | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Reporter** | Jochen | **Assigned To** | yakobowski | **Resolution** | fixed | | **Priority** | normal | **Severity** | minor | **Reproducibility** | always | | **Platform** | - | **OS** | - | **OS Version** | - | | **Product Version** | Frama-C Oxygen-20120901 | **Target Version** | Frama-C Neon-20140301 | **Fixed in Version** | Frama-C Neon-20140301 | ### Description : Running "frama-c -val ftest.c" on the attached program produces a "[value] Function foo: postcondition got status invalid" in line 6, although the ensures clause looks quite reasonable. (I don't understand the notion of a "postcondition status": shouldn't the postconditions of a function be satisfied automatically if all its preconditions are?) The warning disappears if the ensures clause in line 5 is removed or an appropriate function body (e.g. the one commented out at the end of line 6) is added. ## Attachments - [ftest.c](/uploads/0c897adefea2db69ea93598a19ce19bc/ftest.c)