Make identifiers in Coq proofs more similar to those from C code
ID0001630: This issue was created automatically from Mantis Issue 1630. Further discussion may take place here.
| Id | Project | Category | View | Due Date | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID0001630 | Frama-C | Plug-in > wp | public | 2014-01-23 | 2015-03-17 |
| Reporter | jens | Assigned To | correnson | Resolution | fixed |
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Platform | - | OS | - | OS Version | - |
| Product Version | Frama-C Fluorine-20130601 | Target Version | - | Fixed in Version | Frama-C Sodium |
Description :
When I want to proof an obligation for function foo(int* a, int n) then the Coq representation of the obligation uses the identifiers "a_0" and "n_0". In my opinion, the proofs would be easier to read if WP would generate the names "a" and "n". (I often use "remember a_0 as a" to achieve this, but it would be nicer if I did not have to do it manually.)